ILI-LSE Supervision (ILI as Supervisor)

The core mechanism of Supervision (Revision) is that the Supervisor’s leading function impacts the Supervisee’s vulnerable/PoLR function—their weakest point. As a result, the supervisee often loses energy and feels drained.

However, under comfortable conditions this vulnerable spot can gradually be “pumped up,” making the person stronger in that area. Thus, Supervision is not purely negative. In skilled hands, it becomes a powerful tool for support and the development of information metabolism. The supervisee begins to see a different world and eventually ascends to a new level.

Theoretical Profile of the ILI–LSE Pair

In the ILI–LSE pair, the primary connection runs along Practical Logic (Te), focusing on efficiency, practical value, and the necessity of earning a living.

LSE's Relationship with Time

LSEs are highly practical types whose priority is work, profit, and immediate results. Because their Ni is weak, they rarely listen to internal timing cues. They seize any task that seems profitable, working like clockwork, often taking on too much at once. This leads to fussiness, constant switching between tasks, and frequent exhaustion. Over time they develop a more measured pace, but initially they easily get stuck in time. Even when focused on one task, they feel the next one pressing urgently behind them.

I had an elderly LSE acquaintance who had almost no natural feel for time, so she lived strictly by the clock. One morning she needed to leave for her garden plot at 9:00 AM. She woke at 8:00, drank tea, and began meticulously cleaning the gas stove. By the time I entered the kitchen at 10:00 AM she was still scrubbing. When I asked about the garden, she snapped out of it, panicked, grabbed her bags, and rushed off shouting, “Oh, I’m late!” This last-minute rush is classic vulnerable Ni.

In contrast, an ILI with three minutes left can calmly sip coffee, daydream, then naturally shift rhythms and arrive exactly on time. As Supervisor, the ILI constantly notices how poorly the LSE manages time.

Strategic Distinction & Long-Term Results

A deeper difference lies in temporal strategy:

Conclusion

Overall, this remains a very complex and demanding intertype dynamic.

Source: O. Mikhevnina